Why a digital disposable camera works better than a shared album
The shared album always sounds like the answer, and then somebody needs the right account, somebody else will not make one, and two people upload everything while the rest mean to and never do. A year later, the best photo of the evening is still sitting in a stranger’s camera roll behind a name you never got.
A QR code makes it simple. Guests point their phone at the card on the table, the page opens, they type a name once so you know whose photos are whose, pick what they have taken and send it. It takes about as long as reading this paragraph, and it works on a phone bought last week or six years ago.
That is why it suits so many occasions: a wedding where the photographer cannot be at every table, a fortieth where nobody wants to be on duty with a camera, a christening where the grandparents take the only photos anyone will want later, a company party where a shared drive means requests to IT.
Digital vs. physical disposable camera
| Digital | Physical | |
|---|---|---|
| Film and development to pay for | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| App or account for guests | ✕ No | — |
| Cameras to hand out and collect | ✕ No | ✓ Yes |
| See the photos the same evening | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Full-resolution files you can keep | ✓ Yes | ✕ No |
| Video as well as stills | ✓ Paid plan | ✕ No |